Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey) ; 39(1):164-168, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1897391

ABSTRACT

Following the spread of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, surgical associations have issued their different recommendations for managing the acute cholecystitis (AC) clinic during the pandemic. We aimed to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic period on our clinical approach in patients who presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and were diagnosed with AC. Medical records of patients diagnosed with AC in the emergency room between 11 March 2020 and 10 March 2021 and in the same period of one year before the pandemic were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups as COVID-19 period (Group 1) and non-COVID period (Group 2). Demographics and clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes of these two groups were compared. The number of patients diagnosed with AC in the emergency department decreased during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. When the time between the onset of the complaints and the admission to the emergency service was evaluated, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p>0.05). The distribution of cholecystitis type and TG18 severity grading for AC were similar in both groups (p>0.05). While percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is more preferred in the treatment of AC during the pandemic period and the number of delayed interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy decreased, AC management was similar in both periods with no significant statistical difference (P>0.05). In conclusion, our clinical approach and management in the treatment of AC did not differ when compared to the pre-pandemic period.

2.
European Heart Journal ; 42(SUPPL 1):1755, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1553912

ABSTRACT

Objective: COVID-19 is a disease with high mortality, and risk factors for worse clinical outcome have not been well-defined yet. The aim of this study is to delineate the prognostic importance of presence of concomitant cardiac injury on admission in patients with COVID-19. Methods: For this multi-center retrospective study, data of consecutive patients who were treated for COVID-19 between March 20 - April 20 2020 were collected. Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and outcomes data were obtained from electronic medical records. In-hospital clinical outcome was compared between patients with and without cardiac injury. Results: A total of 607 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were included in the study;the median age was 62.5±14.3 years, and 334 (55%) were male. Cardiac injury was detected in 150 (24.7%) of patients included in the study. Mortality rate was higher in patients with cardiac injury (42% vs. 8%;p<0.01). The frequency of patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) (72% vs.19%), who developed acute kidney injury (AKI) (14% vs. 1%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (71% vs. 18%) were also higher in patients with cardiac injury. In multivariate analysis, age, coronary artery disease (CAD), elevated CRP levels, and presence of cardiac injury (OR: 10.58, 95% CI: 2.42-46.27;p<0.001) were found to be independent predictors of mortality. In subgroup analysis, including patients free of history of CAD, presence of cardiac injury on admission also predicted mortality (OR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.17-5.45;p=0.018). Conclusion: Cardiac injury on admission is associated with worse clinical outcome and higher mortality risk in COVID-19 patients including patients free of previous CAD diagnosis.

3.
Journal of Cleaner Production ; : 127704, 2021.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1253148

ABSTRACT

In this study, solar energy-based integrated gasification system designed to produce multiple useful commodities, such as hydrogen, biogas, freshwater, domestic hot water, and power, for a sustainable community is developed and presented. COVID-19 has shown humanity the importance of renewable energy systems and proper waste management systems. In this developed system, the shredded waste tires are used to produce energy in the form of hydrogen and the syngas produced at the gasification unit. It is further utilized for the closed Rankine cycle and Forward-Multi Effect Desalination Unit. This hybrid system is also incorporated with integrated anaerobic digestion and composting unit to create a circular economy unlike traditional systems. This proposed system is simulated dynamically by investigating the effect of changing solar intensities throughout the months in a year. Furthermore, the gasification products are analyzed by altering the steam and oxygen feed rate within the system. This system utilizes closed landfills with a renewable energy system, Solar Tower Cycle, to produce energy and steam. This steam is then further utilized at the gasification unit as a gasification agent to increase hydrogen production. The total energy and freshwater produced within this integrated system is calculated to be 163 MW/h and 2.16 tonnes during its operation in a day. In addition, the hydrogen to fuel ratio at the gasifier and the hourly methane production at the anaerobic digestion unit are found to be 0.175 and 309 m3/h, respectively. The overall energy and exergy efficiency of this proposed system is observed to be 74% and 73%, in this order.

4.
European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences ; 25(8):3272-3278, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1209821

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Ventricular arrhythmias were the most frequent manifestations in patients with COVID-19. Both the natural course of the disease and the treatment drugs used have effects on ventricular repolarization. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of repolarization parameters obtained from surface electrocardiography (ECG) on prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants were 205 consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 diagnosis. The 12-lead surface ECG was obtained from each patient on admission. The ECG results were evaluated against the patients' clinical characteristics and outcomes by experienced cardiology specialists. RESULTS: The mean age was higher in the non-survivor group compared to the survivor group (57.4 +/- 15.7 vs. 65.6 +/- 16.6;p = 0.001). The demographical characteristics were similar between the survivor and non-survivor groups. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that age (OR: 1.041;p = 0.009), D-dimer (OR: 1.002;p = 0.031), high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) (OR: 1.010;p = 0.041), pneumonia on computed tomography (CT) (OR: 4.985;p < 0.001), the peak-to-end interval of the T wave (Tp-e) (OR: 3.421;p < 0.001), and Tp-e/QTc ratio (OR: 1.978;p = 0.013) were statistically significant independent predictors in terms of determining mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged Tp-e interval and increased Tp-e/QTc ratio on admission are decent predictors and linked with mortality. ECG is a practical study to evaluate prognosis and potential arrhythmias, as well as initiating suitable treatment.

5.
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology ; 24(SUPPL 1):62-63, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1175928

ABSTRACT

Background and Aim: A new infectious outbreak sustained by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is now spreading all around the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) and right ventricular longitudinal strain (RV-LS) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, data were gathered from patients treated for COVID-19 between April 15 and April 30, 2020. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2-DE) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) images were obtained for all patients. Patients were divided into three groups: those with severe COVID-19 infection, those with non-severe COVID-19 infection, and those without COVID-19 infection (the control group). Data regarding clinical characteristics and laboratory findings were obtained from electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 100 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 were included in this study. The mean age of the severe group (n=44) was 59.1±12.9, 40% of whom were male. The mean age of the non-severe group (n=56) was 53.7±15.1, 58% of whom were male. Of these patients, 22 died in the hospital. In patients in the severe group, LV-GLS and RV-LS were decreased compared to patients in the non-severe and control groups (LVGLS: -14.5±1.8 vs. -16.7±1.3 vs. -19.4±1.6, respectively [p<0.001];RV-LS: -17.2±2.3 vs. -20.5±3.2 vs. -27.3±3.1, respectively [p<0.001]). The presence of cardiac injury, D-dimer, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), LV-GLS (OR:1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-2.47;p=0.010) and RV-LS (OR:1.55, 95% CI 1.07-2.25;p=0.019) were identified as independent predictors of mortality via multivariate analysis. Conclusions: LV-GLS and RV-LS are independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.

7.
Jan 29;
Non-conventional in English | Jan 29 | ID: covidwho-1061180

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide. The effect of the pandemic on emergency general surgery patients remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To reveal the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortality and morbidity among emergency general surgery cases. DESIGN AND SETTING: Data on patients who were admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Samsun, Turkey, and had consultations at the general surgery clinic were analyzed retrospectively. METHODS: Our study included comparative analysis on two groups of patients who received emergency general surgery consultations in our hospital: during the COVID-19 pandemic period (Group 2);and on the same dates one year previously (Group 1). RESULTS: There were 195 patients in Group 1 and 132 in Group 2 (P < 0.001). While 113 (58%) of the patients in Group 1 were women, only 58 (44%) were women in Group 2 (P = 0.013). Considering all types of diagnosis, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.261). The rates of abscess and delayed abdominal emergency diseases were higher in Group 2: one case (0.5%) versus ten cases (8%);P < 0.001. The morbidity rate was higher in Group 2 than in Group 1: three cases (1.5%) versus nine cases (7%);P = 0.016. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has decreased the number of unnecessary nonemergency admissions to the emergency department, but has not delayed patients' urgent consultations. The pandemic has led surgeons to deal with more complicated cases and greater numbers of complications.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL